home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sundog.tiac.net!not-for-mail
- From: dmeyer@tiac.net (David Meyer)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Subject: Re: FinalWriter for Windows 95
- Date: 6 Mar 1996 04:40:58 GMT
- Organization: The Internet Access Company
- Message-ID: <4hj50q$a0u@sundog.tiac.net>
- References: <4hbk06$cne@nntp5.u.washington.edu> <woody-0403960709310001@woody.softwood.com> <4hilnu$kc4@Holly.aa.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sunspot.tiac.net
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950726BETA PL0]
-
- Jerry Barlow (jabar@aa.net) wrote:
- :
- : So why did AT not include FinalWriter, but instead chose WordsWorth? Is
- : it because AT is essentially a Euro company, and WordsWorth is a UK program?
- :
- No fair, Jerry. First: both programs are roughly equivalent and only one
- could be chosen. Second: what makes you think Woody, or anyone else who
- follows this newsgroup, knows what led to this decision? I'm sure there
- were serious discussions all around and that both software houses built
- products for the task. Then someone made a decision. The fact that Digita
- is a Euro house and owns a larger chunk of the Euro market might have
- weighed in their favor. Ask the guys at AT, only they know.
-